Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Revalidation Beats Stateful Routing for Scientific Surrogates Under Distribution Shift

Surrogate models are often chosen during development and then left in place as new measurements arrive. That practice becomes risky when noise, input support, or physical parameters change. We asked whether such changes call for a stateful adaptive controller, or whether it is enough to validate the candidate models again on each new batch. To study this question, we built RegimeShift-Surrogates, a reproducible streaming benchmark spanning eight analytic and dynamical tasks, four stationary or shifting regimes, ten held-out seeds, and eight classical, multilayer-perceptron, and Kolmogorov-Arnold network surrogates. The confirmatory run contains 30,720 model fits and 3,200 scored deploymen...

AuthorsHarshil Lodhiya
Primary categorycs.LG
Published31 August 2026
Last updated at source31 August 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f79fdf53-07ba-4ae1-9984-d9cbd6be2af8" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.