Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Not All Synthetic Data Are Equal: Expert-Committee Audit Screening for Imbalanced Crash-Injury-Severity Prediction in Automated Driving Systems

Automated driving systems (ADSs) are increasingly operating on public roads, raising safety concerns, yet reliable prediction of crash injury severity remains difficult because crash reports are limited, severe outcomes are rare, and injury classes are highly imbalanced. Existing augmentation methods mainly increase minority-class sample size but rarely assess whether generated samples are credible for safety-critical prediction. This study proposes Expert-Committee Audit Screening (ECAS), a credibility-aware sample acceptance framework for ADS crash injury severity prediction under data imbalance. Using 1,477 incident-level ADS crashes from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administrat...

AuthorsZewei Li, Qiaoqiao Ren, Hang Yang et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published30 August 2026
Last updated at source30 August 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7d282241-1c27-43d1-b21f-7ff8a9996b9b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.