Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Where Cyber Agents Struggle: Bottleneck Analysis of Multi-Stage LLM Agents

Multi-stage LLM-based cyber agents may complete attack workflows while remaining brittle, costly, or reliant on incorrect interpretations of execution evidence. Success rates alone obscure inefficiency, adaptation through retries, and recognition of success or failure. We present an end-to-end diagnostic study of an Autonomous Adversary system with orchestrator, executor, and validator LLMs in enterprise-like lateral-movement scenarios. Six frontier models are evaluated across two scenarios and three modes: expert-defined, self-scaffolded, and fully autonomous. We assess validator consistency and evidence grounding; introduce a subtask-conditioned, cost-aware score for abnormal token use,...

AuthorsSaeedeh Lohrasbi, Mohammad Mamun, Ahmed Yehia et al.
Primary categorycs.CR
Published23 September 2026
Last updated at source23 September 2026
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SE
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8d315859-489e-4624-897d-8745492739cd" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.