Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

A comparative assessment of global building and settlement datasets across geographic and settlement contexts

Global building and settlement products increasingly support population mapping, exposure assessment, and urban monitoring, yet comparative evidence remains fragmented across representations, geographic contexts, and evaluation methods. We benchmark seven global or near-global products against harmonized reference building footprints across 135 study areas. Our representation-aware framework integrates complementary measures of detection, geometric agreement, and aggregate quantity accuracy with stratified analyses of settlement characteristics, evaluation resolution, reference provenance, and temporal alignment. Overture Maps achieved the highest median city-level vector F1 (0.786), whil...

AuthorsRufai Omowunmi Balogun, Caroline Margaux Gevaert, Capucine Riom et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published23 September 2026
Last updated at source14 October 2026
cs.CVeess.IV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f5f736df-2455-4f42-b865-6eddd83518da" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.