Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Do We Need Complex Topology Control? Distinct-Peer Random Routing Improves Cost-Efficiency in Sparse Multi-Agent Debate

Multi-agent debate (MAD) has emerged as a promising paradigm for improving the reasoning accuracy of large language models (LLMs) through iterative peer interaction. Communication topology plays a central role in this process, motivating increasingly sophisticated mechanisms that learn, adapt, or dynamically reconfigure agent interactions to improve accuracy or reasoning reliability. Meanwhile, prior studies suggest that much simpler sparse communication can already achieve competitive performance at substantially lower cost. In this work, we take a closer look at sparse MAD and ask whether complex topology control is actually necessary to improve collective reasoning. We find that a simp...

AuthorsBoxuan Wang, Zhuoyun Li, Xiaowei Huang et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published22 September 2026
Last updated at source22 September 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ce072bab-fff7-471f-9caa-1c93bb91e55b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.