Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When Learned Context Planning Fails to Beat Strong Retrieval: A Controlled Study of Planning, Routing, and Reranking for Long-Context QA

Learned context planning selects evidence atoms before an answer model reasons over them. We test whether this learned selection improves long-context multiple-choice QA after strong retrieval, routing, budgeted-selector, and reranking controls. Our primary diagnostic uses all 503 LongBench-v2 MCQ questions with Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct. The planner is SFT-trained on outcome-selected traces from 140 training and 28 development questions; because the 503-question analysis includes those questions, it is partly transductive. At an 18k-character budget, anchored hybrid retrieval reaches 36.18% accuracy and BM25 reaches 35.98%, while the best direct planner-guided method reaches 34.19%. On the unt...

AuthorsYingrui Li, Han Chen
Primary categorycs.CL
Published22 September 2026
Last updated at source22 September 2026
cs.CLcs.IR
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e1c142ab-4385-47e2-9bae-1730a5365271" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.