Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Detecting GPT-Assisted Writing Using Interpretable Stylometric Features

Distinguishing GPT-assisted from independently authored student writing has become a critical challenge in academia. This paper evaluates the discriminative capability of interpretable stylometric features extracted solely from submitted text. Using data from 90 participants who wrote both independently and with ChatGPT assistance, we evaluate eight machine learning classifiers while keeping data from the same participant together during validation. On the held-out test set, Random Forest achieved an ROC-AUC of 0.87 and an F1-score of 0.84, with False Positive and False Negative rates of 22.2% and 11.1%, respectively. SHAP analysis shows that lexical and grammatical characteristics drive ...

AuthorsRajesh Kumar, Nabeel Siddiqui, Alexander Fuchsberger
Primary categorycs.CL
Published22 September 2026
Last updated at source22 September 2026
cs.CLcs.CY
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b0bb3092-be03-43fa-90cf-9db99e09a995" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.