Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Deep Generative Crystal Structure Prediction: A Benchmark Study and a Controlled Test of Prototype Dependence

Deep generative models are widely reported to enable de novo crystal structure prediction (CSP), but their capability has not been measured consistently against template-based methods. We evaluate 12 representative generative CSP models, spanning latent-variable, diffusion, flow-matching, autoregressive, and manifold random-walk architectures, against TCSP 2.0 on 180 test structures and a leakage-controlled subset of 46. All methods use identical structure-matching, symmetry, and consensus criteria. Template retrieval is the strongest single method, reaching 68.3% top-1 success; symmetry-aware EquiCSP (66.4%) and Uni-3DAR (62.9%) form the next tier. However, comparison with TCSP 2.0 shows...

AuthorsLai Wei, Rongzhi Dong, Ying Feng et al.
Primary categorycond-mat.mtrl-sci
Published22 September 2026
Last updated at source22 September 2026
cond-mat.mtrl-scics.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d7b6573c-ce7b-499c-aab9-212ac3556265" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.