Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

What Drives Hierarchy-Aware Image Retrieval? Taxonomy Alignment, Objective Choice, and Geometry

Foundation vision models provide strong generic representations, yet high class-level retrieval accuracy does not necessarily imply that an embedding respects a target semantic taxonomy. We study strict explicit-taxonomy image retrieval on frozen DINOv2 features and ask: when hierarchical retrieval improves, how much of the change is associated with the organization of taxonomy-aware supervision, and how much with the Euclidean-hyperbolic geometry choice? We evaluate higher levels with strict cross-class criteria that exclude finer-grained matches, and compare Euclidean and hyperbolic projections trained with taxonomy-distance regression or a taxonomy-aware supervised contrastive objectiv...

AuthorsLing Shi
Primary categorycs.CV
Published22 September 2026
Last updated at source22 September 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b0c0104d-e086-4a29-b08c-0e59c8f1c604" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.