Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Recovering Agentic Sovereignty: Mitigating the Consensus Paradox via Contrastive Epistemic Decoding

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit a parametric vulnerability to adversarial swarm consensus. To mitigate this sycophancy, we introduce Contrastive Epistemic Decoding (CED), a zero-shot inference intervention. Unlike standard Contrastive Decoding (CD) which relies on a weaker secondary model, CED utilizes a dual forward-pass on a single architecture to isolate conformity bias. By introducing a novel asymmetric, zero-bounded probability clamp and discrete top-k truncation mask, CED mathematically suppresses toxic consensus tokens without causing grammatical collapse. Evaluated across 7,200 paired trajectories on complex benchmarks (GAIA, SWE-bench, Multi-Challenge) using Gemma-2 (9B), Ll...

AuthorsDahlia Shehata, Ming Li
Primary categorycs.AI
Published22 September 2026
Last updated at source22 September 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fc828cb3-b856-4ca1-865a-a8db90e46365" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.