Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Terminal Shrinkage Averaging Reveals a Schedule-Estimator Interaction in LLM Pretraining

Large language model (LLM) pretraining conventionally returns the raw final iterate. This couples two design choices: the learning-rate schedule that generates the parameter trajectory and the estimator that constructs the deployed model (e.g. the raw final iterate or a checkpoint average). A schedule that promotes optimization progress may differ from one that minimizes variation in the raw final iterate. Separating these choices creates an opportunity to maintain progress late in training while reducing variation in the returned model. To this end, we propose \emph{Terminal Shrinkage Averaging (TSA)}, which interpolates between the raw final iterate and the average of recent checkpoints...

AuthorsAdam Ousherovitch, Yixin Wang
Primary categorycs.LG
Published21 September 2026
Last updated at source21 September 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e8d8b0f0-1402-4f91-8220-ca8e5c4355ed" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.