Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Calibration Count Reuse: Validity Does Not Determine Efficiency

Calibration count reuse raises separate validity and efficiency questions. We give a validity criterion for general count-dependent nonconformity scores: transferring one count from another class to the scored class must not improve its conformity. A leave-self-out full conformal reference proves the criterion without requiring normalization or preservation of same-class score order. For a common separable transformation, universal exchangeable validity is equivalent to being nondecreasing in the count, provided $Kα\geq 1$; normalized multiplicative weights obey the complementary nonincreasing condition. Additive penalties are covered under the stated information restrictions. Efficiency ...

AuthorsRudra Chopra
Primary categorystat.ME
Published21 September 2026
Last updated at source21 September 2026
stat.MEcs.CVcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/af2650d0-188d-4eb9-88ee-985817933706" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.