Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Mitigating LLM Over-Refusal via Dynamic Semantic Routing Calibration

Large language models (LLMs) aligned for safety often suffer from over-refusal, incorrectly rejecting benign yet safety-related instructions. Prior studies primarily attribute this to static representation overlap, largely overlooking the underlying dynamic mechanisms. In this paper, we present the mechanistic analysis of over-refusal through the lens of internal routing conflicts within transformer attention. We discover that a sparse subset of Hypersensitive Safety Heads misfires on Hard-Safe prompts, exhibiting abnormal attention entanglement that forcefully binds harmless target entities to refusal semantics. This triggers a severe, high-entropy routing conflict that deprives target e...

AuthorsZixuan Wang, Bingjie Zhang, He Zhao et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published6 September 2026
Last updated at source1 October 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9b465f35-655c-4eda-b157-92c10297f824" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.