Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Comparing Latent Concept Formation in State Space Models and Transformers via Sparse Autoencoders

The quadratic scaling of Transformer self-attention has driven the adoption of sub-quadratic Selective State Space Models (SSMs) like Mamba, which compress past context into a fixed-size recurrent hidden state. This strict informational bottleneck raises a foundational question for mechanistic interpretability: do SSMs and Transformers learn fundamentally distinct latent representations? In this work, we employ Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to conduct a large-scale, feature-level correspondence analysis between Mamba-130m and Pythia-70m over a 10-million token corpus. Contrary to hypotheses predicting widespread architectural divergence, we find no evidence of systematic representational div...

AuthorsRithin Nagaraj, Rupa Laalasa Oruganti, Prerna Subhashchandra Kunder et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published21 September 2026
Last updated at source21 September 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8396514d-c6b4-422b-a066-6be33ea3fbea" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.