Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

CREDO: Variance-Guided Rubric Evolution for Replay-Corrected Credit Assignment

Long-horizon language agents receive sparse terminal feedback, while intermediate rubrics provide structured but potentially misspecified assessments of progress. In resettable training environments, counterfactual continuation rollouts can measure local credit, but exhaustive replay is costly. We propose Credo, a framework that couples evolving semantic rubrics with selective, execution-based credit correction. A frozen judge maps visible transitions to rubric features, and a credit head predicts the change in expected terminal reward associated with the realized transition. Independently sampled two-sided replays correct prediction residuals using their recorded inclusion probabilities....

AuthorsXuchun Hu
Primary categorycs.AI
Published21 September 2026
Last updated at source21 September 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/78e970a0-3431-4243-9e0f-fbda9129e057" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.