Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

XYEval: Agents say yes to bad advice

Effective communication between users and AI agents is essential for human-AI collaboration. The XY problem is a well-known communication pitfall where a person asks about their attempted solution rather than their actual problem. We extend prior sycophancy evaluation to the XY problem in agentic settings, evaluating whether agents can resist plausible but misleading suggestions from users and communicate their reasoning. We introduce XYEval, a meta-evaluation framework that can transform an existing benchmark into an XY problem evaluation. We evaluate five models across six diverse benchmark suites. Agents suffer large XY drops under XY mutation across benchmarks, with relative drops rea...

AuthorsZhengxuan Wu, Yuxuan Li, Oyvind Tafjord et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published20 September 2026
Last updated at source20 September 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8fe97584-c56a-4ba4-976f-dc8443c611ec" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.