Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

The Exponential Price of Determinism in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization

We study the complexity of finding $(δ,ε)$-Goldstein stationary points of nonsmooth nonconvex Lipschitz functions. By now, it is known that randomized first-order algorithms can solve this task with a dimension-free oracle complexity [Zhang et al., 2020], whereas deterministic algorithms cannot, as their complexity must scale at least linearly with the dimension $d$ [Jordan et al., 2023, Tian and So, 2024]. This leaves open whether deterministic algorithms can nevertheless solve the problem with oracle complexity polynomial in $d$. We answer this question negatively by proving a lower bound of order $(1/ε)^{Ω(d)}$ for deterministic algorithm, closing the exponential gap between the previo...

AuthorsGuy Kornowski
Primary categorymath.OC
Published20 September 2026
Last updated at source20 September 2026
math.OCcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/df3b6eab-16c7-4d88-b171-e13643a803ea" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.