Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Per-Query Gating of LLM Rerankers for Multi-Hop Retrieval

LLM rerankers add of the order of \$0.2-0.3 per 1,000 queries and about a second of tail latency on top of a graph-augmented dense pipeline such as HippoRAG2, and on three multi-hop benchmarks they improve final-hop top-K coverage on seven of nine (dataset, K) cells, by up to +34.8 pp. We ask whether a learned per-query gate can skip the reranker where it will not help, using only features available before the LLM call (27 score and lexical statistics of the two retrieval lists plus a PCA of a small query embedding) with an executable fallback. Every choice, including the fallback and the threshold, is made inside the training fold and applied once to held-out queries, and harmful skips (...

AuthorsAndre Bacellar
Primary categorycs.IR
Published19 September 2026
Last updated at source19 September 2026
cs.IRcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7a2d3b61-1ef7-48b4-8d1d-7b7f29c7df90" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.