Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Assessing Adversarial Robustness of Latent Reasoning Models

Large language models increasingly rely on long chain-of-thought (CoT) trajectories for complex reasoning, but autoregressive generation brings substantial memory and inference costs. Latent reasoning models (LRMs) offer a more efficient alternative by compressing intermediate reasoning into a small number of continuous latent vectors. Despite their efficiency, however, the adversarial robustness of LRMs remains largely underexplored. In this work, we systematically evaluate the robustness of latent reasoning across textual and multimodal settings, covering eight models and six benchmarks. We find that, across our evaluated settings, LRMs are generally less robust than explicit CoT baseli...

AuthorsShaolong Chen, Ang Li, Mingjie Li et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published3 September 2026
Last updated at source3 September 2026
cs.CLcs.LGstat.ML
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c65bafcf-180b-4b41-9df3-9bd2209a055b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.