Do LLMs Choose Like Humans? Using Cognitive Theory to Evaluate LLM Decision-Making
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit a range of human-like decision-making behaviors, but whether these reflect similar underlying mechanisms or surface-level mimicry remains unclear. We evaluate whether LLM context sensitivity aligns with a cognitive economic theory that explains human behavior through problem categorization and attention allocation. Across 12 open-source and commercial LLMs on a novel 140,000-trial product choice benchmark, context induces human-like shifts in choice and problem categorization, but does not reliably reweight attention between features like price and quality. Neither scale nor chain-of-thought reasoning reliably attenuates context sensitivity or generate...
| Authors | Johnathan Sun, Andrei Shleifer, Yonatan Belinkov |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.CL |
| Published | 2 September 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 2 September 2026 |
Connected in the knowledge graph
- johnathansun/llm-cognitive-choiceDataset · cited by
Models and datasets referencing this paper
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.