Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Moral Entropy: Auditing Bias and Uncertainty in Moral Judgment

Most work in computational ethics treats annotator disagreement on moral content as noise to be voted away, collapsed into majority vote or the more permissive any-annotator rule the moment a single annotator flags an item. We argue this uncertainty should instead be modeled and learned from. We introduce Moral Entropy, a Bayesian framework that keeps a full posterior over the true label and decomposes its entropy into aleatoric uncertainty (irreducible disagreement about the moral content) and epistemic uncertainty (from insufficient or noisy annotation) -- and lets any heuristic consensus rule be audited against a calibrated ground truth via entropy methods such as cross-entropy/KL, Bri...

AuthorsMaciej Skorski
Primary categorycs.CL
Published18 September 2026
Last updated at source18 September 2026
cs.CLcs.CYstat.ML
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ea69c2ab-6c10-44cc-8d41-4728e791bc1a" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.