Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

IncentRL: The Trade-Off Between Preference Guidance and Task Performance

Preference-based reward shaping can guide reinforcement learning, but adding preference signals to the reward may unintentionally change the task being optimized. We address this problem with IncentRL, a framework that introduces preference guidance while explicitly characterizing its effect on external-task performance. IncentRL adds a Kullback--Leibler (KL) penalty between a specified outcome distribution and a preferred distribution. For finite discounted Markov decision processes with bounded shaping costs, we derive an external-value perturbation bound, establish a sufficient strict-action-gap condition for preserving the original optimal policy, and characterize the large-weight reg...

AuthorsXuening Wu, Yanlan Kang, Shenqin Yin
Primary categorycs.LG
Published18 September 2026
Last updated at source18 September 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c813b23f-d026-464d-9f1e-4eef2379b1dd" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.