Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Ranking Competing geologic interpretations via foundation-model-assisted generative hydrologic inversion

High-consequence subsurface decisions often rely on sparse data that permit competing geological interpretations. Determining consistency of these interpretations with the available observations remains challenging. We present a workflow that addresses this challenge by translating competing geologic interpretations into alternative priors and ranking them according to their consistency with hydraulic-head observations. A key step in this workflow is exploiting the broad knowledge of image-generation foundation models to transform nuanced geologic interpretations into data ready for computer modeling. For each interpretation, a text-to-image foundation model generates an ensemble of geolo...

AuthorsHarun Ur Rashid, Daniel O'Malley
Primary categorycs.LG
Published17 September 2026
Last updated at source22 September 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/809a55e6-e519-4c41-a890-941ee722bdb5" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.