Monitoring and Discovering Reward Hacking with Internal Representations during LLM Evaluations
As models scale, reward hacking becomes more frequent, more sophisticated, and more consequential. Does it leave a telltale signature in model representations? This work analyzes how reward hacking is represented internally in frontier open source LLMs, and how those representations can be used to understand and discover the range of hacking behaviors a model displays. In particular, we find that simple difference of means vectors coherently represent reward hacking in Kimi K3, GLM 5.2, and Qwen 3.8 Max across a variety of behaviors in common evaluations. Despite their simplicity, these vectors are both generalizable and interpretable, and we can use them to reliably detect reward hacking...
| Authors | Leon Bergen, Usha Bhalla, Andrew Lee et al. |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.CL |
| Published | 16 September 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 9 October 2026 |
Connected in the knowledge graph
- Goodfire/reward-hack-dataDataset · cited by
Models and datasets referencing this paper
- Goodfire/reward-hack-dataDataset
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.