Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Function Lives Where Variance Doesn't: Task-Weighted Charts of a Language Model's Computation

How many dimensions does a language model's computation actually use? The question is ill-posed until one names a functional. Task-weighted charts make it well-posed: low-dimensional coordinate systems fit against a chosen functional of the representation, under the functional's own metric, turning distillation into plain least squares. Across six models from three families, spanning 70m to 7B parameters, next-token prediction needs 70--90% of the residual stream's width to stay within 5% of intact perplexity, a width consumed by the rare tail of language, and the variance profile predicts none of it: two directions carry 90% of GPT-2's activation variance and almost none of its function....

AuthorsAlexandre Quemy
Primary categorycs.AI
Published12 August 2026
Last updated at source12 August 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/da3dc536-f3ac-451c-ac75-eb2d3be23a73" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.