Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

A Study of the Reliability of Agentic AI-Generated Programs

Agentic-AI based software development offers the promise of faster completion of the software, greater programmer efficiency, and more reliable code. The question is how can we verify these claims in an objective way? In this project, we attempted to answer this question based on three practices. First, we applied a typical best-practices agentic AI workflow for software development. Second, our target programs were ten well-known, release-quality human-written Linux utility programs so that we could compare the AI-generated code against a concrete ground truth. Third, we based our measure of reliability on a widely used testing technique, fuzz random testing. For this testing, we used bo...

AuthorsAyesha Shafique, Barton P. MIller, Elisa R. Heymann
Primary categorycs.SE
Published16 September 2026
Last updated at source23 September 2026
cs.SEcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bfe6bba9-034b-47e3-9210-542b39b9caca" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.