Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

I code or AI code: A comparative evaluation of AI-rated scores in classroom observations

Classroom observations are widely recognized as a key tool for establishing benchmarks of education quality and guiding pedagogical improvement, yet they remain resource-intensive and dependent on trained observers. This study evaluated the feasibility of using a LLM (GPT-5 model) to score teacher-child interactions in early childhood classrooms, benchmarked against human raters. The study analyzed 87 video-recorded observations from 38 classrooms across 30 kindergartens in Hong Kong. Using observation transcripts, the AI model was configured to apply the full Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) framework. AI-rated scores were then compared with human ratings by examining correlat...

AuthorsY. Fong, J. Xiang, T. Y. D. Chan et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published16 September 2026
Last updated at source16 September 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e9de9f7d-6f1e-449c-9cd1-1d349133f9cd" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.