Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Designing Agentic AI Workflow Portfolios under Imperfect Selection and Compute Cost

Agentic AI systems often approach the same task through multiple workflows that differ in reasoning strategy, verification structure, and compute cost. A natural deployment policy is to use the workflow with the highest average performance, but this can be suboptimal because different workflows may succeed on different instances. We study a portfolio-and-selector paradigm in which a firm runs multiple workflow executions and selects the final answer after observing their outputs. Additional executions may uncover correct answers that the best standalone workflow misses, but they consume compute and introduce plausible distractors that complicate final selection. We formulate this as a wor...

AuthorsMojtaba Abdolmaleki, Stefanus Jasin, Boyu Wang
Primary categorycs.AI
Published16 September 2026
Last updated at source16 September 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8e2afe43-3c30-4796-9cb0-76c31a3eca84" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.