Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

The Missing "I Don't Know": Why Three Reasoning-Reliability Findings Converge on Calibrated Abstention

Three recent results describe what look like unrelated LLM reliability problems. Yin et al. (2026) show reasoning RL collapses tool-reliability representations. Suleymanov et al. (2026) show that under safety-constrained generation, large models rewrite flagged spans while small models truncate. Bastounis et al. (2024) prove any consistent-reasoning system without an implicit "I don't know" function must hallucinate infinitely often on broad problem classes. We argue these findings converge on a single intervention: calibrated abstention is what each independently identifies as the missing capability, even though the unavailability they document, a capability gap, a policy gap, and a recu...

AuthorsSrijith Ravikumar
Primary categorycs.LG
Published15 September 2026
Last updated at source15 September 2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f86cb732-39fb-4aef-b70f-7ee6b451a766" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.