Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Optical-Flow Wingbeat Counting in MuJoCo: A Comparison of Convolutional, Spiking, and Attention-Based Temporal Models

Visual monitoring of flapping-wing vehicles requires distinguishing individual wingbeats from motion strength and average frequency. This paper presents a controlled MuJoCo evaluation of wingbeat counting from signed optical flow observed by virtual cameras mounted on Crazyflie vehicles. Three flapping-wing models were recorded at optical distances of 1.5 and 3.0 m, producing 1,440 clips from 240 paired scene configurations with a scene-level 3:1 training-test split. A common spatial convolutional encoder was combined with a causal temporal convolutional network, a recurrent leaky integrate-and-fire spiking network, or causal self-attention. Each model predicted phase and activity, follow...

AuthorsZhang Nengbo
Primary categorycs.CV
Published15 September 2026
Last updated at source15 September 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c924e56b-97c5-462c-bb8a-6ed63a36394b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.