Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When Confidence Signals Disagree: Local and Global Confidence in Autoregressive Language Models

Modern predictive systems expose multiple quantities that are commonly interpreted as measures of confidence. However, these quantities can summarize different aspects of the predictive process. This distinction matters when confidence is used to evaluate reliability or inform downstream oversight and control. We investigate whether different confidence readouts are empirically interchangeable in an autoregressive language model by comparing local confidence, defined from the probability of the greedy-selected answer token, with global confidence, defined from modal-answer frequency under repeated sampling. Across MMLU and ARC Challenge, the two signals are weakly correlated and differ su...

AuthorsJulio C. Amador Diaz Lopez
Primary categorycs.LG
Published15 September 2026
Last updated at source15 September 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b9b74c22-2c5f-4081-811f-f58fa3c0e89f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.