Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Noise2Noise Revisited: Training Pair Distributions Dominate Loss Choice in Self-Supervised Denoising

Noise2Noise (N2N) trains denoisers on pairs of independently corrupted observations, eliminating clean references. We stress-test two natural conjectures about why the L1 loss outperforms L2 here. First, the hypothesis that the L1 loss confers robustness via parameter sparsity confuses the loss with Lasso regularization: an explicit Lasso penalty produces the predicted sparsity yet fails to reproduce L1's cross-noise behavior, while L1- and L2-trained weight distributions are indistinguishable. Second, the population optima of the two losses coincide exactly for symmetric signal posteriors and nearly so for concentrated ones. Measured differences are therefore dominated by optimization dy...

AuthorsDingyan Shang, Zhenyu Xu, Youting Wang et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published15 September 2026
Last updated at source15 September 2026
cs.LGcs.CVeess.IV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f451883c-c787-430c-a57b-95379d497a0f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.