Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Few-Shot Degradation Is Not What It Seems: Behavioral Evidence, Representation Analysis, and a Random-Text Control Across 12 Models, 2 Tasks, and 2 Architectures

Few-shot prompting sometimes degrades language models instead of helping them, but why this happens is unknown. We evaluate 12 open-weight models on two Ukrainian tasks news classification and legal case outcome prediction and find that the effect is strongly task-dependent: the same models that gain +24 pp on news show only +3.4 pp on legal text, with two models degrading. To understand why, we look inside the models. Prior work measures how much hidden states shift between zero-shot and few-shot modes, but few-shot prompts are much longer, and that length difference alone moves representations. We propose a simple fix: replace demonstrations with length-matched random text to measure th...

AuthorsVolodymyr Ovcharov
Primary categorycs.CL
Published23 May 2026
Last updated at source23 May 2026
cs.CLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8024458d-87e7-461d-9e47-6a4a412b6997" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.