Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Verifiable by Construction: Claim-Level Evaluation of Verbatim Citation in Clinical Question Answering

Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted for clinical question answering (QA). Current systems can attach citations to their answers, but these often point to broad texts, leaving time-pressed clinicians unable to verify them efficiently. An alternative is to ensure that responses are verifiable by construction: providing fine-grained verbatim quotes from reference material that substantiate claims, so users can verify an answer without opening other documents. In this paper, we evaluate the ability of current models to perform this task end-to-end: from providing citations for every factual claim, to producing verbatim quotes, to ensuring that those quotes fully substantiate...

AuthorsJiashuo Zhang, Yuling Chen, Yvonne Commodore-Mensah et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published14 September 2026
Last updated at source17 September 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/dace9d0e-7e66-4f02-bd38-537ce07d3b97" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.