Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When the Wrong Key Wins: Understanding and Detecting Hallucinations in LLMs

Large language models can hallucinate even when the knowledge required for a correct answer is already available. We study this failure through a latent-key view of inference, where answer selection depends on competition among associations acquired during pretraining. We show that model predictions can be highly sensitive to individual query keywords, that these influential keywords exhibit entity-specific binding, and that their effects are systematically shaped by pretraining frequency. Multiple bindings can also compete and exhibit higher-order interactions within the same query. Based on this mechanism, we introduce a two-stage keyword-perturbation method for hallucination detection....

AuthorsXuhan Tong, Haoyue Bai, Dawei Zhou et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published14 September 2026
Last updated at source29 September 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c3f87cc5-3e59-4bfe-b7fe-6dd4b0c4ecbd" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.