Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

PIDS-Bench: Evaluating Prompt-Injection Detectors Under Over-Defense, Obfuscation, and Distribution Shift

Prompt-injection detectors are typically evaluated using aggregate F1 on in-distribution test data, which offers limited insight into behavior under distribution shift, particularly on the benign side of the decision boundary, where false positives impose direct operational cost yet are seldom measured. We present PIDS-Bench, a frozen multi-axis benchmark that jointly evaluates attack detection and benign false-positive behavior at fixed thresholds, spanning in-distribution inputs, hard-benign prompts that mimic injection structure without malicious intent, obfuscated attacks, and domain and structural distribution shifts. We evaluate seven detectors (learned baselines, external prompt-in...

AuthorsYusuf Khalid Shire, Sang-Chul Kim
Primary categorycs.CR
Published14 September 2026
Last updated at source14 September 2026
cs.CRcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9d89f0fc-2b2d-4b97-a981-aef22b0df4dc" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.