Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

GroundBench: A Factorized, Counterfactual Benchmark for Locating VLM Affordance Failures

A companion evaluation found that naming the target part in a manipulation prompt increased action accuracy by 0.32-0.63 across eight vision-language models, with no model outperforming a constant baseline until the part was named. However, naming the part supplies information that a real system must infer, confounding visual grounding, mechanical reasoning, and category-to-action association. We introduce GroundBench, a diagnostic benchmark that separates these explanations through six branch-and-merge conditions, each adding a controlled information bundle, and a counterfactual re-ask targeting a real alternate part visible in the same image. Across three OpenAI models and 1,068 predict...

AuthorsSarthak Sattigeri
Primary categorycs.CV
Published10 September 2026
Last updated at source10 September 2026
cs.CVcs.LGcs.RO
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/86bb998b-b403-456a-9af8-33d171fe028f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.