Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Algorithm Validation as a Policy Audit: Evidence from Race-blind Charging

California recently required all prosecutors in the state to conduct a "race-blind charging" decision by reviewing case documents in which selected race-related proxies have been redacted. We validate bc2, an open-source, LLM-based algorithm that we developed to automate this redaction and that was used to facilitate race-blind review in more than 119,000 real-world cases in 2025. We evaluate two distinct questions: whether bc2 faithfully implements the state's requirements and whether those requirements, even when faithfully implemented, advance the goal of race-blind decision-making. To do so, we draw on a corpus of nearly 5,000 real-world police reports that we assembled from jurisdict...

AuthorsMuskan Walia, Joe Nudell, Alex Chohlas-Wood
Primary categorycs.CY
Published27 July 2026
Last updated at source27 July 2026
cs.CYcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bde33c48-25b5-4ba2-9d6c-9db321a927c6" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.