Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Explanations-Driven Active Feature Acquisition for Algorithmic Recourse

Algorithmic recourse methods typically assume that a predictive model has access to all features of an individual. In practice, decisions are often made with partial information, because features are costly to acquire. Active feature acquisition addresses cost-constrained prediction, but existing methods are explanation-agnostic: prior work provides explanations only after acquiring additional features, rather than using explanations to drive acquisition. This work flips that and treats algorithmic recourse and feature acquisition jointly. We use Markov Blanket theory to unify counterfactual, semifactual, and alterfactual explanations and to characterize how available recourse grows as fe...

AuthorsVinura Galwaduge, Jagath Samarabandu
Primary categorycs.LG
Published10 September 2026
Last updated at source10 September 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/784e42df-bfa5-451e-9c80-6d19e1e18935" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.