Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

The Convention Gap: Beyond Literal Content in Human-AI Cooperation

Cooperative AI agents are often evaluated against other AIs, yet human cooperation is thought to rely on implicit conventions: shared rules for reading meaning beyond the literal message. We propose the convention gap as a diagnostic of such implicit communication. In the card game Hanabi, where hints are the only messages about one's own hand, the convention gap is the failure probability predicted exactly from the literal content of the hints and the visible cards, minus the observed failure rate of the cards played. We prove that the population gap (the value the gap approaches over many games) is zero when the partner's choices convey nothing beyond their literal content, given a fair...

AuthorsMakoto Fukushima, Hua-Dong Xiong, Ehsan Moradi Pari
Primary categorycs.AI
Published10 September 2026
Last updated at source9 October 2026
cs.AIcs.HC
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/88b84cc2-19dc-4316-86e3-42b46f4afa1d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.