Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Rubric-Aligned Disentangled Evaluation of Human Simultaneous Interpreting

Human simultaneous interpreting (SI) is commonly assessed with analytic rubrics separating meaning transfer, delivery quality, and temporal synchrony, yet no automatic metric is designed for rubric-aligned segment-level SI evaluation. We construct a professionally annotated corpus of 1,101 SI segments with scores for meaning transfer (LQ), delivery quality (EXP), and perceived latency (LAT). We show that structured LLM prompting and scalar supervision collapse rubric dimensions, yielding near-zero correlation with human ratings and strong cross-dimension coupling. To isolate supervision structure under identical backbone capacity, we introduce dual regression heads on a LoRA-adapted COMET...

AuthorsZiyu Zhang, Satoshi Nakamura
Primary categorycs.CL
Published10 September 2026
Last updated at source10 September 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/93f5928e-c893-4835-8048-f4b47bd012da" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.