Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Understanding LoRA Rank Trade-offs in Diffusion Model Fine-Tuning

Selecting LoRA rank for diffusion fine-tuning requires balancing quality and compute cost. We present a controlled study on CIFAR-10 using a DDPM U-Net with ranks {2,4,8,16,32}, fixed optimization settings, and a reproducible local-folder pytorch-fid protocol. We report FID, trainable parameters, runtime, and GPU memory, then validate trends with extended-budget DDPM runs (20 epochs; ranks 4/8/16) and a Tiny DiT backbone (10 epochs; ranks 4/8/16). Results show moderate ranks are most efficient: rank 4 achieves the best DDPM FID (124.1380), rank 8 is close (124.2136), and higher ranks provide limited gains despite larger adaptation cost. These findings support small-to-moderate ranks as pr...

AuthorsIman Khazrak, Narges Nejad, Mostafa M. Rezaee et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published9 September 2026
Last updated at source9 September 2026
cs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/789bc749-d321-4d32-a95b-a8988412b995" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.