Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

What Fixed-Rollout pass@k Evaluations Can Identify

Repeated-sampling evaluations increasingly extrapolate pass@k far beyond the number n of samples collected per problem. We show that, in the pooled/random-task conditional-Binomial model, fixed-n success counts identify only the n free moments of the latent per-task success distribution. Consequently, direct pass@k is identified for k <= n, but generic extrapolated pass@k, tail exponents, and tail constants are not identified for k > n, even with arbitrarily many exchangeable tasks at the same rollout budget. This is stronger than the observation that the usual estimator is undefined beyond n: it characterizes the information missing from the fixed-depth count-law experiment. We give exac...

AuthorsPranav Singh, Prashant Singh
Primary categorystat.ML
Published8 September 2026
Last updated at source8 September 2026
stat.MLcs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e5e457f3-4900-45bb-8533-25bcae7c2100" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.