Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Why shared attention vectors fail: a case for outcome-indexed tuning

Dimensional attention in learning is often implemented as a globally shared attention vector, where each stimulus dimension corresponds to a single scalar. These scalars are learned by models through gradient-descent on error, where predictive features acquire more salience. We show that under multi-outcome learning, where models predict more than one outcome, this shared vector becomes unstable; it collapses to its bounds and prevents the models from learning meaningful attentional tunings for learning and generalization. We address this by introducing an outcome-indexed attentional matrix that converts globally shared attentional tuning into an outcome-indexed representation. We present...

AuthorsLenard Dome
Primary categorycs.LG
Published8 September 2026
Last updated at source8 September 2026
cs.LGcs.NEq-bio.NC
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bd50fa79-47d5-44e5-9dbf-8197be3cc5a6" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.