Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Popular Knowledge Propagates More Errors in LLM Knowledge Updating

Updating a language model's knowledge through fine-tuning is essential for keeping its outputs current, yet can also induce factual forgetting and new hallucinations. Prior work shows that long-tail knowledge is harder to acquire and newly memorized long-tail facts are difficult to retain during later fine-tuning. We study a complementary question: among facts that a model has encoded correctly, which are most vulnerable to collateral corruption during other updates? To investigate this question under a realistic factual distribution, we construct a large-scale graph FACTPROP of verified Wikipedia facts by linking triples that share head or tail entities, thereby preserving connections am...

AuthorsYuji Zhang, Weibing Wang, Cheng Qian et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published8 September 2026
Last updated at source8 September 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/aefb251c-dc31-4616-a8ce-d43ff4e8bace" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.