CoER: Defending against Adaptive Indirect Prompt Injection via Adversarial Co-Evolution and Refinement
Language-model agents are vulnerable to indirect prompt injection (IPI) during tool use: adversarial instructions hidden in untrusted tool outputs can covertly redirect legitimate task execution. Existing work often trains and evaluates defenses against fixed attacks that do not adapt to the defender's behavior, so the resulting defenses may struggle against adaptive attacks in real-world settings. We argue that a strong defense against adaptive IPI must adapt during training to a continually evolving attacker. Building on this insight, we propose CoER, a verifier-grounded co-evolution and refinement framework that models interleaved tool calls and adaptive injections within a task as a g...
| Authors | Boyang Zhang, Qingxin Xiao, Lingwei Dang et al. |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.LG |
| Published | 7 September 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 30 September 2026 |
Popularity, last 2 days
0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.
Connected in the knowledge graph
- Z-Edgar/CoER-DefenderModel · cited by
- Z-Edgar/CoER-Attacker-SFTDataset · cited by
- Z-Edgar/CoER-AttackerModel · cited by
- Z-Edgar/CoER-RLDataset · cited by
- Z-Edgar/CoER-Defender-SFTDataset · cited by
Models and datasets referencing this paper
- Z-Edgar/CoER-AttackerModel
- Z-Edgar/CoER-DefenderModel
- Z-Edgar/CoER-RLDataset
- Z-Edgar/CoER-Defender-SFTDataset
- Z-Edgar/CoER-Attacker-SFTDataset
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 18 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.