Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Revisiting Complete Reasoning Traces for Post-Training

Large language models (LLMs) are often post-trained on pre-collected reasoning trajectories to improve their reasoning capability. Such trajectories tend to be long due to complex, interwoven paths, which often include detours on the path toward the answer. However, it has been underexplored whether LLMs indeed benefit from learning complete trajectories in post-training, such as supervised fine-tuning (SFT). Starting from our pilot study, we find that full trajectories provide only limited benefit, while partial trajectories are effective even under heavy truncation. We analyze redundancy in reasoning trajectories through attention-based analyses and controlled token-removal studies, bot...

AuthorsJaehui Hwang, Sangdoo Yun, Byeongho Heo et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published7 September 2026
Last updated at source7 September 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/884a7764-7ac4-42e4-8e17-239022ffd443" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.