Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Comparing Self-Supervised and Domain-Invariant Features for Cross-Domain Voice Phishing Detection

Voice phishing detection faces three critical challenges: real criminal recordings are unavailable due to privacy constraints; when available, only a handful of samples exist, insufficient for fine-tuning; and lightweight acoustic-only detection is needed as an alternative to large self-supervised models. We compare domain-invariant prosodic features and self-supervised representations (HuBERT, wav2vec2.0) through cross-domain evaluation-training on scenario-based actor recordings and testing on authentic criminal calls. Domain-invariant prosodic features achieve 69.5% F1 zero-shot and 71.0% with 5-shot learning. HuBERT achieves highest performance (94.2% F1, 5-shot), while wav2vec2.0 exh...

AuthorsJeongmin Lee, Seung Yun, Minkyu Lee et al.
Primary categorycs.SD
Published7 September 2026
Last updated at source7 September 2026
cs.SDcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/858f2af9-eb56-4a9d-aacc-437cbe3f9733" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.