Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Are Verifier Errors Independent Within a GRPO Group? Evidence from Qwen2.5 Rollouts

Group-based reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) scoresmultiple completions per prompt using automatic verifiers. Analysesbased on independent verifier errors may overlook dependence associatedwith shared answer formats. We investigate this dependence in24,998 groups of eight completions generated by Qwen2.5-1.5B onMATH, GSM8K, and DeepMath-103K. We estimate a pooled within-groupverifier-error correlation of 0.530 (95% confidence interval:0.500--0.560). Under an exchangeable-error model, this correspondsto a design-effect-adjusted effective sample size of 1.70 for aneight-completion group. Dependence varies substantially across answerforms: fractions, radicals, symbolic e...

AuthorsEsther Xin
Primary categorycs.LG
Published6 September 2026
Last updated at source6 September 2026
cs.LGcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d6647aee-3dd0-42d1-a5d6-c8ced3460705" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.