Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

FMMO: Detecting the Divergence Between Local Attribution and Global Drift

Post-deployment drift poses a critical risk to algorithmic accountability, particularly when ground truth labels are delayed and performance degradation becomes a "silent failure". While Explainable AI (XAI) is often relied upon to audit these shifts, we demonstrate that popular local attribution methods (e.g., TreeSHAP) can exhibit misleading stability even as model reliability collapses. In this paper, we propose a Framework for Model Monitoring and Observability (FMMO) designed to expose the divergence between local explanation stability and global distribution shifts. Using benchmark, synthetic, and real-world datasets, we show that local XAI methods fail to flag drift-induced dispara...

AuthorsMuhammad Rehman Zafar, Ali El-Sharif, Naimul Khan
Primary categorycs.LG
Published5 September 2026
Last updated at source5 September 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fde129bc-b8b7-4052-9ce4-d0b67e9e3a3f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.